Scrum and Kanban are both popular frameworks under the Agile umbrella, but they differ in how they structure work, roles, and processes.
|
Aspect |
Scrum |
Kanban |
|
Type |
A prescriptive
Agile framework |
A flexible
workflow management method |
|
Work
Structure |
Time-boxed
Sprints (usually 2–4 weeks) |
Continuous
flow – work
is pulled as capacity allows |
|
Roles |
Defined
roles: Scrum Master, Product Owner, Dev Team |
No
required roles, but teams often define their own |
|
Planning |
Sprint
Planning, Backlog Grooming, Reviews |
No
formal planning events required |
|
Work
Limitation |
Sprint
backlog limits work during a sprint |
Uses WIP
limits (Work In Progress limits) |
|
Meetings |
Daily
Scrum, Sprint Review, Sprint Retrospective |
Daily
stand-ups (optional), and flow reviews |
|
Metrics |
Velocity,
Burndown chart |
Lead
time, Cycle time, Cumulative flow diagram |
|
Best
For |
Teams
working in iterations, with evolving requirements |
Teams
needing flexibility and continuous delivery |
|
Change
During Cycle |
Not
allowed during a sprint |
Allowed
anytime – very adaptive |
|
Delivery |
At the
end of the sprint |
Delivered
as soon as it's ready |
🎯 Summary
-
Scrum is structured, ideal for teams that benefit from a regular cadence and clear roles.
-
Kanban is lightweight and more flexible, great for teams needing continuous delivery and fewer constraints.
🧠Think of Scrum as working in "sprints," while Kanban is like a "relay race" – keep things flowing.
No comments:
Post a Comment